Home Comparison Intel Xeon E5 1607 v2 vs AMD EPYC 9474F

Intel Xeon E5 1607 v2 vs AMD EPYC 9474F

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 1607 v2 with 4 cores 3GHz and AMD EPYC 9474F with 48 cores 3.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon E5 1607 v2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 360W)
AMD EPYC 9474F 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 1600)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 3GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 10MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon E5 1607 v2
536
AMD EPYC 9474F +294%
2117
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon E5 1607 v2
1820
AMD EPYC 9474F +1202%
23699
Blender
Intel Xeon E5 1607 v2
28
AMD EPYC 9474F +5242%
1496
VS

General Parameters

Sep 2013
Release Date
Nov 2022
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Ivy Bridge-E
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel Socket 2011
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E5 (Ivy Bridge-E)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

1.86 billions
Transistor Count
52.56 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
130 W
Power Consumption
360 W
70 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
257 mm²
Die Size
8x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

3 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
4
Total Core Count
48
4
Total Thread Count
96
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
30.0
Multiplier
36.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
10 MB shared
L3 Cache
256 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR3-1600
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
4
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy