Home Comparison Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654

Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2 with 4 cores 3.7GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.7GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Lower TDP (130W vs 360W)
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 1866)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 10MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2
690
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 +187%
1984
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon E5 1620 v2
2533
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 +687%
19940
VS

General Parameters

Sep 2013
Release Date
Mar 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Ivy Bridge-E
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel Socket 2011
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E5 (Ivy Bridge-E)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

1.86 billions
Transistor Count
78.84 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
130 W
Power Consumption
360 W
70 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
257 mm²
Die Size
12x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

3.7 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
4
Total Core Count
96
8
Total Thread Count
192
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
37.0
Multiplier
24.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
10 MB shared
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR3-1866
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
4
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy