Intel Xeon E5 1620 vs AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 1620 with 4 cores 3.6GHz and AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U with 8 cores 3.3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Xeon E5 1620 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 3.3GHz)
AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 3)
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 10MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 32nm)
Lower TDP (28W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon E5 1620
690
AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U
+112%
1467
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon E5 1620
2533
AMD Ryzen Embedded 8840U
+28%
3245
General Parameters
Mar 2012
Release Date
Apr 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Sandy Bridge-E
Core Architecture
Hawk Point
Intel Socket 2011
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
N/A
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 780M
Xeon E5 (Sandy Bridge-E)
Generation
Ryzen Embedded (Zen 4 (Hawk Point))
Package
1.27 billions
Transistor Count
25 billions
32 nm
Manufacturing Process
4 nm
130 W
Power Consumption
28 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
294 mm²
Die Size
178 mm²
CPU Performance
3.6 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
4
Total Core Count
8
8
Total Thread Count
16
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
36.0
Multiplier
33.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
10 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR3
Memory Types
DDR5-5600
4
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
4
-
PCIe Lanes
20
