Intel Xeon E5 1680 v2 vs AMD EPYC 9335
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 1680 v2 with 8 cores 3GHz and AMD EPYC 9335 with 32 cores 3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Xeon E5 1680 v2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 210W)
AMD EPYC 9335 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 1866)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 25MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 22nm)
Score
General Parameters
Sep 2013
Release Date
Oct 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Ivy Bridge-EP
Core Architecture
Turin
Intel Socket 2011
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E5 (Ivy Bridge-EP)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))
Package
2.8 billions
Transistor Count
33.26 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
4 nm
130 W
Power Consumption
210 W
85 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
341 mm²
Die Size
4x70.6 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
mm²
CPU Performance
-
Performance Cores
32
-
Performance Core Threads
64
3 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
8
Total Core Count
32
16
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
30.0
Multiplier
30.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
25 MB shared
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR3-1866
Memory Types
DDR5-6000
-
Max Memory Size
6 TB
4
Max Memory Channels
12
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
