Intel Xeon E5 2687W v3 vs AMD EPYC 9384X
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 2687W v3 with 10 cores 3.1GHz and AMD EPYC 9384X with 32 cores 3.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Xeon E5 2687W v3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 320W)
AMD EPYC 9384X 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2133)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (768MB vs 25MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon E5 2687W v3
1115
AMD EPYC 9384X
+94%
2169
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon E5 2687W v3
7965
AMD EPYC 9384X
+116%
17274
General Parameters
Sep 2014
Release Date
Jun 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Haswell-EP
Core Architecture
Genoa-X
Intel Socket 2011-3
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E5 (Haswell-EP)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Package
2.6 billions
Transistor Count
90.16 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
160 W
Power Consumption
320 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
356 mm²
Die Size
8x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
10
Total Core Count
32
20
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
31.0
Multiplier
25.5
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
25 MB shared
L3 Cache
768 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2133
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
4
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
5
40
PCIe Lanes
128
