Intel Xeon E7 4820 v3 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E7 4820 v3 with 10 cores 1.9GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 with 8 cores 1.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Xeon E7 4820 v3 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (1.9GHz vs 1.5GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (25MB vs 16MB)
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Higher specification of memory (2133 vs 1866)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 22nm)
Lower TDP (30W vs 115W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon E7 4820 v3
349
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
+126%
789
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon E7 4820 v3
+81%
3792
AMD EPYC Embedded 3201
2087
General Parameters
Jun 2015
Release Date
Feb 2018
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Haswell-EX
Core Architecture
Zen
Intel Socket 2011-1
Socket
AMD BGA SP4r2
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E7 (Haswell-EX)
Generation
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Package
5.96 billions
Transistor Count
4.8 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
115 W
Power Consumption
30 W
70 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
622 mm²
Die Size
213 mm²
CPU Performance
1.9 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
10
Total Core Count
8
20
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
19.0
Multiplier
15.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
25 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
4
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR3,DDR4-1866
Memory Types
DDR4-2133
4
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
3
32
PCIe Lanes
32
