Home Comparison Intel Xeon Gold 5318N vs AMD EPYC 9654

Intel Xeon Gold 5318N vs AMD EPYC 9654

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Gold 5318N with 24 cores 2.1GHz and AMD EPYC 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon Gold 5318N 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 360W)
AMD EPYC 9654 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2667)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 2.1GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 36MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 10nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2022
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Ice Lake-SP
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel Socket 4189
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Gold (Ice Lake-SP)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

-
Transistor Count
78.84 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
150 W
Power Consumption
360 W
83 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
12x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

2.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
24
Total Core Count
96
48
Total Thread Count
192
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
24.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
36 MB shared
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2667
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
8
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
5
64
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy