Intel Xeon Gold 5318S vs AMD EPYC 73F3
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Gold 5318S with 24 cores 2.1GHz and AMD EPYC 73F3 with 16 cores 3.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Xeon Gold 5318S 's Advantages
Lower TDP (165W vs 240W)
AMD EPYC 73F3 's Advantages
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 2933)
Higher base frequency (3.5GHz vs 2.1GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 36MB)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 10nm)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon Gold 5318S
+151%
1261
AMD EPYC 73F3
501
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon Gold 5318S
+361%
10832
AMD EPYC 73F3
2348
General Parameters
Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2021
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Ice Lake-SP
Core Architecture
Milan
Intel Socket 4189
Socket
AMD Socket SP3
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Gold (Ice Lake-SP)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 3 (Milan))
Package
-
Transistor Count
33.2 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
165 W
Power Consumption
240 W
87 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
8x81 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
12 nm
-
I/O Die Size
416 mm²
CPU Performance
2.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
24
Total Core Count
16
48
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
35.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 KB per core
36 MB shared
L3 Cache
256 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
Cores per CCD
2
2
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2933
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
8
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
4
PCIe Version
4
64
PCIe Lanes
128
