Home Comparison Intel Xeon Phi 3120P vs AMD EPYC 9684X

Intel Xeon Phi 3120P vs AMD EPYC 9684X

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 3120P with 57 cores 1.1GHz and AMD EPYC 9684X with 96 cores 2.55GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon Phi 3120P 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 400W)
AMD EPYC 9684X 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Higher specification of memory (DDR5-4800 vs DDR3)
Higher base frequency (2.55GHz vs 1.1GHz)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Jun 2013
Release Date
Jun 2023
PCIe
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Corner
Core Architecture
Genoa-X
PCIe x16
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

5 billions
Transistor Count
135.24 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
PCIe x16
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
300 W
Power Consumption
400 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
350 mm²
Die Size
12x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
PCIe x16
Package
FC-LGA6096

CPU Performance

1.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.55 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
57
Total Core Count
96
228
Total Thread Count
192
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
11.0
Multiplier
25.5
32 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
1152 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR3,
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy