Home Comparison Intel Xeon W 2102 vs AMD EPYC 9654

Intel Xeon W 2102 vs AMD EPYC 9654

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon W 2102 with 4 cores 2.9GHz and AMD EPYC 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon W 2102 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.9GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Lower TDP (120W vs 360W)
AMD EPYC 9654 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2666)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 8.25MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon W 2102
894
AMD EPYC 9654 +121%
1984
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon W 2102
2849
AMD EPYC 9654 +599%
19940
VS

General Parameters

Aug 2017
Release Date
Nov 2022
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Skylake-W
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel Socket 2066
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon W (Skylake-W)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

-
Transistor Count
78.84 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
120 W
Power Consumption
360 W
66 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
484 mm²
Die Size
12x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

2.9 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
4
Total Core Count
96
4
Total Thread Count
192
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
29.0
Multiplier
24.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
8.25 MB shared
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
1
AVX-512 FMA Ports
-

Memory Parameters

DDR4-2666
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
4
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

3
PCIe Version
5
48
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy