Home Comparison Intel Xeon W 3365 vs AMD EPYC 9474F

Intel Xeon W 3365 vs AMD EPYC 9474F

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon W 3365 with 32 cores 2.7GHz and AMD EPYC 9474F with 48 cores 3.6GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon W 3365 's Advantages
Lower TDP (270W vs 360W)
AMD EPYC 9474F 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 2.7GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 48MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 10nm)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon W 3365
1902
AMD EPYC 9474F +11%
2117
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon W 3365
18361
AMD EPYC 9474F +29%
23699
VS

General Parameters

Jul 2021
Release Date
Nov 2022
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Ice Lake-W
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel Socket 4189
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon W (Ice Lake-W)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

-
Transistor Count
52.56 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
270 W
Power Consumption
360 W
81 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
8x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

2.7 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
32
Total Core Count
48
64
Total Thread Count
96
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
27.0
Multiplier
36.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
48 MB shared
L3 Cache
256 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
8
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
5
64
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy