Home Comparison Intel Xeon W 3365 vs AMD EPYC 9825

Intel Xeon W 3365 vs AMD EPYC 9825

We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon W 3365 with 32 cores 2.7GHz and AMD EPYC 9825 with 144 cores 2.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Xeon W 3365 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.7GHz vs 2.2GHz)
Lower TDP (270W vs 390W)
AMD EPYC 9825 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 48MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 10nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Jul 2021
Release Date
Oct 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Ice Lake-W
Core Architecture
Turin
Intel Socket 4189
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon W (Ice Lake-W)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))

Package

-
Transistor Count
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
270 W
Power Consumption
390 W
81 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
mm²

CPU Performance

-
Performance Cores
144
-
Performance Core Threads
288
2.7 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
32
Total Core Count
144
64
Total Thread Count
288
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
27.0
Multiplier
21.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
48 MB shared
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR5-6000
-
Max Memory Size
6 TB
8
Max Memory Channels
12
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
Official Website
4
PCIe Version
5
64
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy