Intel Xeon w7 3455 vs EPYC Embedded 8324P
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon w7 3455 with 24 cores 2.5GHz and EPYC Embedded 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
EPYC Embedded 8324P 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Higher base frequency (2.65GHz vs 2.5GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 67.5MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 10nm)
Lower TDP (180W vs 270W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon w7 3455
+8%
1807
EPYC Embedded 8324P
1664
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon w7 3455
11021
EPYC Embedded 8324P
+21%
13349
General Parameters
Feb 2023
Release Date
Sep 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Sapphire Rapids
Core Architecture
Siena
Intel Socket 4677
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon W (Sapphire Rapids)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Package
-
Transistor Count
35.5 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
270 W
Power Consumption
180 W
72 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
4x477 mm²
Die Size
4x73 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.65 GHz
4.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
24
Total Core Count
32
48
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
25.0
Multiplier
26.5
80 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
2 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
67.5 MB
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
2
AVX-512 FMA Ports
-
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
4 TB
Max Memory Size
-
8
Max Memory Channels
6
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
5
112
PCIe Lanes
96
