Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Intel Arc 140V
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Plus Graphics 640 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arc 140V to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 140V 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 86% (2050MHz vs 1100MHz)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Plus Graphics 640
845
Intel Arc 140V
+385%
4100
3DMark Time Spy
Iris Plus Graphics 640
515
Intel Arc 140V
+719%
4222
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Sep 2024
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Battlemage
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
600 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
MHz
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
16GB
System Shared
Memory Type
LPDDR5x
System Shared
Memory Bus
64bit
System Dependent
Bandwidth
GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
384
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
6
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
8
-
L2 Cache
0
Theoretical Performance
6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.6 GPixel/s
52.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
1.690 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
TFLOPS
844.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.1 TFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
15W
-
Suggested PSU
W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 2.1
1x eDp 1.5
-
Power Connectors
Graphics Processor
Kaby Lake GT3e
GPU Name
Intel Arc Graphics 140V
-
GPU Variant
Generation 9.5
Architecture
Xe2
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm++
Process Size
3 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12.2
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
