Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon Graphics 320SP
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Plus Graphics 640 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 320SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Plus Graphics 640 's Advantages
64 additional rendering cores
Radeon Graphics 320SP 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1400MHz vs 1100MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Plus Graphics 640
845
Radeon Graphics 320SP
+6%
896
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Jan 2020
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Renoir
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
400 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
1400 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
384
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
20
6
ROPs
8
Theoretical Performance
6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
52.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
1.690 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1.792 TFLOPS
844.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
896.0 GFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
56.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
15W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Kaby Lake GT3e
GPU Name
Renoir
Generation 9.5
Architecture
GCN 5.1
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm++
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
9.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
156 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
