Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GMA 500
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and 0System Shared VRAM GMA 500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1150MHz
288 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
+6033%
736
GMA 500
12
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Mar 2008
HD Graphics
Generation
GMA Graphics-T
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
320
Shading Units
32
40
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
1
Theoretical Performance
4.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
200.0 MPixel/s
46.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
800.0 MTexel/s
736.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.80 GFLOPS
184.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
Haswell GT3e
GPU Name
Poulsbo
Generation 7.5
Architecture
PowerVR SGX535
Intel
Foundry
Intel
22 nm
Process Size
130 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1
4.3
OpenGL
ES 2.0
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.0
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
