Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1150MHz vs 1100MHz)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
736
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Mobile
+129%
1690
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Sep 2020
HD Graphics
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
320
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
0 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
46.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.379 TFLOPS
736.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.690 TFLOPS
184.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
422.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
15W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
Haswell GT3e
GPU Name
Tiger Lake GT2
Generation 7.5
Architecture
Generation 12.1
Intel
Foundry
Intel
22 nm
Process Size
10 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.0
Vulkan
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
