Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs GeForce 940MX
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 2GB VRAM GeForce 940MX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1650MHz vs 1242MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 16.02GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
GeForce 940MX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 25W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
+165%
2534
GeForce 940MX
954
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Jan 2016
HD Graphics-M
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
1004 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1242 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1001 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
16.02GB/s
Render Config
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.936 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.81 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
953.9 GFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
29.81 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
23W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
GM108
-
GPU Variant
N16S-GTR-S
Generation 12.1
Architecture
Maxwell
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
95 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
