Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon Pro 5300M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1650MHz vs 1250MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 85W)
Radeon Pro 5300M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2534
Radeon Pro 5300M
+26%
3200
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
Nov 2019
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
768
Shading Units
1280
48
TMUs
80
24
ROPs
32
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.00 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.0 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.400 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.200 TFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
85W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PROA
Generation 12.1
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
6.4 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
