Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon R5 M330
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M330 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 60% (1650MHz vs 1030MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Radeon R5 M330 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 25W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
+284%
2534
Radeon R5 M330
659
Graphics Card
Oct 2020
Release Date
May 2015
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
955 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1030 MHz
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
20
24
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.240 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.60 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
659.2 GFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
41.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
18W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG1
GPU Name
Exo
-
GPU Variant
Exo PRO
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.69 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
56 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
