Home Comparison Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon R7 M350 2GB

Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs Radeon R7 M350 2GB

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M350 2GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Iris Xe MAX Graphics +300%
2534
Radeon R7 M350 2GB
633

Graphics Card

Oct 2020
Release Date
May 2015
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Gem System(R7 M300)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2133 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR4X
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.26GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

39.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
79.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
5.069 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
633.6 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
633.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent

Graphics Processor

DG1
GPU Name
Litho
-
GPU Variant
Litho XT (216-0868010)
Generation 12.1
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.95 billion
95 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
© 2025 - TopCPU.net