Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs GRID K280Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB and 4GB VRAM GRID K280Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (15W vs 225W)
GRID K280Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 68.29GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
1280
GRID K280Q
+78%
2289
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2013
Tegra
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.29GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
32
Tensor Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
2.560 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1280 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
GA10B
GPU Name
GK104
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
