Home Comparison Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs GRID RTX T10 16

Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs GRID RTX T10 16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 150W)
GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 68.29GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
1280
GRID RTX T10 16 +681%
9999

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Tegra
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
68.29GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
56
1024
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
32
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
2.560 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
1280 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA10B
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
18.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net