Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs Quadro FX 1800M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.29GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
952 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
+690%
1280
Quadro FX 1800M
162
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2009
Tegra
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
550 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.29GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
9
1024
Shading Units
72
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
32
Tensor Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.488 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.46 GTexel/s
2.560 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1280 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
162.0 GFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
45W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
GA10B
GPU Name
GT215
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM4
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.727 billion
Unknown
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
