Mobility Radeon X2300 HD vs FirePro M4000
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X2300 HD and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro M4000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 3.024GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
M7x
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
378 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
32bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3.024GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
-
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
1.916 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
1.916 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
33W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
M71
GPU Name
Chelsea
M71-S
GPU Variant
Chelsea XT GL
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
Shader Model
5.1
