Mobility Radeon X2300 HD vs GeForce GTS 160M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X2300 HD and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTS 160M 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 3.024GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Mar 2009
M7x
Generation
GeForce 100M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
378 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
32bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3.024GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
8
-
Shading Units
64
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
1.916 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
1.916 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
60W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
M71
GPU Name
G94
M71-S
GPU Variant
N10E-GS1
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
3.0
Shader Model
4.0