Home Comparison Opteron 148 vs AMD EPYC 9654

Opteron 148 vs AMD EPYC 9654

We compared two server CPUs: Opteron 148 with 1 cores 2.2GHz and AMD EPYC 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Opteron 148 's Advantages
Lower TDP (85W vs 360W)
AMD EPYC 9654 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 400)
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 2.2GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 90nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Aug 2005
Release Date
Nov 2022
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Venus
Core Architecture
Genoa
AMD Socket 939
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Opteron (Venus (E6))
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Package

0.114 billions
Transistor Count
78.84 billions
90 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
85 W
Power Consumption
360 W
-
Foundry
TSMC
115 mm²
Die Size
12x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²

CPU Performance

2.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
1
Total Core Count
96
1
Total Thread Count
192
200 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
11.0
Multiplier
24.0
128 KB
L1 Cache
64 K per core
1 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR1-400
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
2
Max Memory Channels
12
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy