Home Comparison Opteron 148 vs Xeon X3460

Opteron 148 vs Xeon X3460

We compared two server CPUs: Opteron 148 with 1 cores 2.2GHz and Xeon X3460 with 4 cores 2.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Opteron 148 's Advantages
Lower TDP (85W vs 95W)
Xeon X3460 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Higher specification of memory (1333 vs 400)
Higher base frequency (2.8GHz vs 2.2GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (45nm vs 90nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Aug 2005
Release Date
Sep 2009
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Venus
Core Architecture
Lynnfield
AMD Socket 939
Socket
Intel Socket 1156
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Opteron (Venus (E6))
Generation
Xeon(Lynnfield)

Package

0.114 billions
Transistor Count
0.774 billions
90 nm
Manufacturing Process
45 nm
85 W
Power Consumption
95 W
-
Foundry
Intel
115 mm²
Die Size
296 mm²

CPU Performance

2.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.467 GHz
1
Total Core Count
4
1
Total Thread Count
8
200 MHz
Bus Frequency
133 MHz
11.0
Multiplier
21.0
128 KB
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
-
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR1-400
Memory Types
DDR3-1333
2
Max Memory Channels
2
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
PCIe Version
2
-
PCIe Lanes
16

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy