Home Comparison Opteron 43CX EE vs AMD EPYC 9825

Opteron 43CX EE vs AMD EPYC 9825

We compared two server CPUs: Opteron 43CX EE with 4 cores 2.2GHz and AMD EPYC 9825 with 144 cores 2.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Opteron 43CX EE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 390W)
AMD EPYC 9825 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 32nm)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Dec 2012
Release Date
Oct 2024
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Seoul
Core Architecture
Turin
AMD Socket C32
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Opteron (Seoul)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))

Package

1.2 billions
Transistor Count
32 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
35 W
Power Consumption
390 W
-
Foundry
TSMC
315 mm²
Die Size
mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
mm²

CPU Performance

-
Performance Cores
144
-
Performance Core Threads
288
2.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
4
Total Core Count
144
4
Total Thread Count
288
200 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
11.0
Multiplier
21.0
192 K
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
4 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
8 MB shared
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR3
Memory Types
DDR5-6000
-
Max Memory Size
6 TB
Max Memory Channels
12
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

-
Official Website
-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy