Quadro FX 1700 vs Data Center GPU Max 1100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 300W)
Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
7136 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
59
Data Center GPU Max 1100
+37561%
22220
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
7168
16
TMUs
448
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
204 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
694.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.22 TFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.22 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.22 TFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
80 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
100 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
