Quadro FX 1700 vs GRID A100B
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 400W)
GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
6880 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
59
GRID A100B
+23442%
13890
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
108
32
Shading Units
6912
16
TMUs
432
8
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
400W
200 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GA100
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
