Quadro FX 1700 vs GRID RTX T10 16
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 150W)
GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3552 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
59
GRID RTX T10 16
+16847%
9999
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
56
32
Shading Units
3584
16
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
TU102
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
