Quadro FX 1700 vs Quadro K600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K600 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (41W vs 42W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
59
Quadro K600
+469%
336
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.504 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.02 GTexel/s
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
14.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
41W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GK107
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
