Quadro FX 1700 vs Quadro M3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 75W)
Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
59
Quadro M3000M
+3544%
2150
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GM204
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
