Quadro FX 1700 vs Quadro P6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 250W)
Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3808 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
59
Quadro P6000
+21306%
12630
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
30
32
Shading Units
3840
16
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
96
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GP102
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
