Quadro FX 1700 vs Radeon Instinct MI210
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 300W)
Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
6624 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
59
Radeon Instinct MI210
+38255%
22630
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
64GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
104
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
6656
16
TMUs
416
8
ROPs
0
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
Aldebaran
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
