Quadro FX 1700 vs RTX A1000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 60W)
RTX A1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1831MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
59
RTX A1000 Mobile
+12611%
7500
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
630 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1831 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
224GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
16
32
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.9 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.669 TFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.5 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
72.96 GFLOPS
Board Design
42W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GA107
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
