Quadro FX 360M vs Arctic Sound M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 500W)
Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
8176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
26
Arctic Sound M
+56630%
14750
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
8192
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
128
16 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
80 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
8 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
