Quadro FX 360M vs Quadro 2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 62W)
Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (41.60GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
26
Quadro 2000
+1746%
480
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Dec 2010
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
4
16
Shading Units
192
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
62W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GF106
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
