Quadro FX 360M vs Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 55W)
Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
26
Quadro K2000M
+2100%
572
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
55W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GK107
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
