Home Comparison Quadro FX 360M vs Quadro P5200 Mobile

Quadro FX 360M vs Quadro P5200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 100W)
Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1747MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
26
Quadro P5200 Mobile +34303%
8945

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1747 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
20
16
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.8 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
139.8 GFLOPS
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.945 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
279.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

17W
TDP
100W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GP104
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net