Quadro FX 360M vs Quadro Plex 2100 D4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro Plex 2100 D4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 640W)
Quadro Plex 2100 D4 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
112 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
26
Quadro Plex 2100 D4
+1130%
320
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jul 2008
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Plex
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
16
16
Shading Units
128
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
16
16 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.00 GTexel/s
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
320.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
640W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
G92
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
