Quadro FX 360M vs Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 110W)
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
3056 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
26
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
+36407%
9492
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
48
16
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.98 TFLOPS
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.492 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
296.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
110W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
TU104B
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
