Quadro FX 360M vs RTX A4500 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 80W)
RTX A4500 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
5872 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
26
RTX A4500 Max Q
+54938%
14310
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
46
16
Shading Units
5888
8
TMUs
184
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
80W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GA104
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
