Quadro FX 360M vs RTX A500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 20W)
RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
26
RTX A500 Embedded
+20930%
5468
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
435 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
16
16
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
20W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GA107S
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
