Quadro FX 360M vs Tesla S1070
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 800W)
Tesla S1070 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
26
Tesla S1070
+2292%
622
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
30
16
Shading Units
240
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
16 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
800W
-
Suggested PSU
1200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GT200B
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
