Quadro FX 370 vs Quadro FX 880M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.28GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 370
23
Quadro FX 880M
+404%
116
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
500 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
6
16
Shading Units
48
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
16 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
1.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
2.880 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
23.04 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
