Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro 600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
Quadro 600 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
+87%
462
Quadro 600
246
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Dec 2010
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
2
192
Shading Units
96
64
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.560 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.24 GTexel/s
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
245.8 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.48 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
40W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GF108
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
