Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro FX 3500M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)
Score
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-III
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
16
192 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.80 GTexel/s
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
45W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
G71
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.278 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
3.0
