Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs Quadro P3200 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1543MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
462
Quadro P3200 Mobile
+1096%
5530
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1328 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1543 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
14
192
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
24
ROPs
64
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.75 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
86.41 GFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.530 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
172.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GP104
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
